This is why I take surveys. You may be a bit too candid about what you want from participants, but I respect your spirit. There usually is a disclosure in a HIT, though. I always feel like there's a safety net, as long as a HIT says there's no right or wrong answers. Or an oddly short timer. You do neither and there's really no reason to over analyze this HIT.
So I think I figured out why my TO add on was giving me a failure message. When I try to go to a TO review I get this: "Access denied. Your IP address [68.87.68.229] is blacklisted. If you feel this is in error please contact your hosting providers abuse department." What does this even mean?? I'm so confused.
Hrm. These cathrine hits arent that bad actually. Good pay too. Ive been labeling them correctly and using full sentences. So here's to hoping for a payday when they approve. We can do as many as we can get right?
Does it find the SPAM automatically, or is there something we should do to report the SPAM? Some forums I am a member of have a button that we can press to 'report' a post, etc...
Thanks! I love knowing a little bit about why we do what we do. I am enjoying doing these HITs so thanks for putting them up and alerting us to them!!
Rep is starting to get ridiculous. 04-15-2013 11:04 PM Thread: Can't Find Great HITs?... You are so annoying. I bet you were the kind of girl that always gave her goods out for attention.
04-15-2013 03:20 PM Thread: Can't Find Great HITs?... snausages on my legs and my arms for you snausages snausages snausages
Title: Location Preference Survey 4 (time+whom) Requester: SamSurvey2013 [A3NZHTDPKQ4XL3] (TO) Description: Your privacy concern about sharing a location update on social networks Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 50, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2YEAJIA0RYNL8UKPS9R5KMJTZP616W [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]
You really need to slow your roll. It's not like she has zero TO. If you were marginally observant, you would have seen she said it was okay to do it as a batch.