Title: Answer a survey about craft beer in 5 minutes | PANDA Requester: IAG [A1U1NA2CAQ2R1O] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 0.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.00 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: If you buy craft beer, answer a survey that takes less than 5 mins Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 2 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95
Wake up to this: Message from Angela Cirucci --------------------------------- Hi there. Unfortunately there was an issue with your submission and your auto-biography was not recorded. If you would like your HIT approved, please reply with your auto-biography. Thank you! --Angela Fucking goddammit. Rather take the rejection than write that shit again. This. Is. Why. I. Hate. Surveys.
Title: Survey 2 April_14_2016(~ 30 minutes) | PANDA Requester: AG2514 [A3U41OFORZCO1G] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.27 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.99 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.73 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.88 Promptness Number of Reviews: 87 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Survey 2 April_14_2016 Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 25 Reward: $1.25 Qualifications: Exc: [343533-10190] has not been granted, Total approved HITs is not less than 100, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is one of: US 8 min 2 surveys I only met screening for the other one. I imagine they are the same, but mutually exclusive screeners.
Oh that sucks, I regretted not saving mine after I submitted it, but apparently she didn't screw up my batch.
I don't think anyone else had a problem. Just me. Of course. Color me stupid, I had it in one for the word count but didn't bother saving.
I was expecting a note with something along the lines of: "Your writing sucks. Please stick to clicking bubbles."
Wait, so *she* lost your shit, and wants you to rewrite it in order to get paid? That takes some nerve.
I've had cases where I copied and pasted onto the word count box and then went back later to do some more of it to see the same one still up there. Check and see if it's still there. Never know.
Maybe they actually did get it, but your life story was so unbelievable, they just want you to write it again so the can compare lies
Since there was a survey attached to this (after the autobiography field), wouldn't someone sending it after the fact mess up her research? It sucks she lost it, but wouldn't the data be compromised anyway now? She should just pay it since it sounds like a tech glitch in the survey design.
Well it wouldn't ruin any data since he did write the auto-biography at the time he answered the questions.