Today's Projected Earnings $16.07 My best to date. I should go to sleep but I am all ramped up now. Those O'conner ones were good. I hope they all accept or I will be doing .01 hits until I get my approval rating back up.
Wow, that's a ton of email address fetching HITs (Rachel Scott with 9k and AJ Shankar with 7k). I've never been rejected by Rachel but she does reject and block. AJ Shankar rejected 25/40 of the emails I did for him. Would actually pay off to have a data.com account lol but rapportive will have to do! Title: Customer List Email Fetching Requester: Rachel Scott [A3D9EEGRG7BHFI] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.15 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.72 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.75 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 20 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Given a company website, find the name, role, company and email address of one of it's decision makers. Time: 3 hours Hits Available: 9043 Reward: $0.40 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 10000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98 Title: Find the Email Address for a Professional Requester: AJ Shankar [A1EHOE9RV6MPPO] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 2.50 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.40 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 1.60 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 5 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Given a professional's name, company, and work address, find their WORK EMAIL ADDRESS. Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 7008 Reward: $0.15 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90 For Rachel, check data.com for the company, or put "ceo" or "founder" into a google search with email and the business name. Same with AJ but I'm just going to cherry pick those and return the ones that I can't find (usually just google name, business, email so it's a waste of 10-15s). I can do most of these in 1-1:30 unless I use the rapportive add-on and google spreadsheet.
Suggested on the TO forums they make some guidelines for reporting blocks/rejects. Don't know why I'm surprised by the "TO is for the workers not the requesters" response
Maybe I'm just buzzed but wouldn't it be the workers that are reporting, and affected by, blocks and rejects?
I'm back from an internetless hell, and so glad my AWS approved, but like everyone I also got blocked by jolly old Paul.
I'm inebriated and annoyed with my family, so I'm taking a moment to pop on here and wish my adopted family a very merry Christmas. Hope all is well with everyone this fine evening.