I wish I understood how people could do 50 A9s a minute. Maybe it is just my internet connection is too slow and I'm not masters so I get captchas
I don't like these shoe a9s as much as I did the last batch comparing the shirts. Looks like an alegion Saturday for me.
I could see it as dishonest if they were trying to sell the game. However, from what I've been told, it's more of another way of gaining survey data. Kind of like the way Heather uses games.
that''s always bad advice in this case, you are mocking sensors and giving 100% fake data they are paying you to use a phone if they wanted to emulate they would do it themselves previous versions didn't warn you about the requirements of a recent phone so at least they have fixed that part of the hit now if they would only put the requirements in the title
It's solely based on principle, if the requestor wants you to do a certain format (inquisit , mobile) you do that and don't disrespect that. Trust me, I learned and Flora knows about it. Ever since I have never received a rejection, ever again. I will tell all of you one thing, right now, it's not about speed. It's about quality and duration. As ironic as my username is.
Title: Short study with bonus opportunity | PANDA Requester: The Choice Lab [A18FWM3BGZIW4S] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.41 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.27 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.84 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.84 Promptness Number of Reviews: 235 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Short survey with an opportunity to earn a bonus. Time: 2 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: MMCHR has not been granted; Total approved HITs is greater than 1000; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US Haven't done it yet but Choice Lab is usually good.
I'll agree with that. The quality of data really does affect a study, especially if you're trying to publish. I know in many academic programs, if you don't have physical access to your subjects, you can't even get peer reviewed. Without publishing, you don't get grants. No grants means no more research, which threatens the livelihoods of more than just turkers. That's a broad view of it, but it's definitely a reason that I am 100% honest with the work I do for turk. If turk got a reputation for crappy results, the surveys would fall off considerably. My graduate program specifically banned any kind of online research and databases (turk & PA) just for that particular reason. Edit// No, that's Mollie Sugden. She was on a 70s comedy on BBC called Are You Being Served? She's hilarious.
Its just easy for me >.> one of the few things im decent at. I see the entire page and can instantly press a hotkey that is how similar i think it is. I have 2 open at a time though since it take about 2 or 3 seconds to load with comcast.
I so don't want to do these A9. But... anyone have a specific script that works well to save me hunting? The one before I've used for shoes and tops doesn't work because of those extra options about the left side image. That is what is making these slow for me: the constantly changing sub-categories and those left side questions. I've only done a couple of dozen and I've seen flip-flops being passed of in three different categories -- I am talking the left side image here -- Is there even a flip-flop category? Sandals seems best of the ones I've seen. Well, that and 4-5 second load times (at best).
Something to PandA Title: Visual Memory Task | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: raizada lab [A3RTKKK7Y3EV8L] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: [Rate: $10.71/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: memorize colors and pointing directions of visual stimuli Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $5.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US;
Same here. Choice Lab is usually pretty good about the bonus to survey length ratio. I always pick up these surveys when they are available.
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/27685-mturk-a9-data-validation-hotkeys Thats the one im using. I also turned the auto submit on so it submits whenever you press one of the keys >.> they just fly by for me now.
Title: Respond to Planetary Scenario(~ 30 minutes) | PANDA Requester: ATLAS Lab [A1U3WB6R038KTS] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.50 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 2 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: You will be presented with facts about three hypothetical planets, asked to choose the ideal option, and evaluate facts presented. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: SurveyGroup [399] has not been granted;Exc: [43286-43050] has not been granted;TP Panel: 766069763 N is not less than 100;Total approved HITs is not less than 50;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is one of: US 10 minutes