yay I got the obligatory multi-gif response....I feel so legitimate...look away I don't want you to see my tears.
Write a 400 word article for a car. $4.00 https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=3GV45MIM3XJ5KHLXDGX1OVY0ENEZMV
Thank you...and I hope didn't steal your thunder you did ask and I was feeling frisky but if you were wanting to start today's thread I do apologize if that's what you wanted but you did inspire me so you have co-creater credit on this one. I never would have tried it if you had not asked the question.
Scary. It's possible we may not have too many "find the image hits" in the not-too-distant future. And it's because of US. WE did ourselves in! MIT is taking notice of Mechanical Turk.... From MIT's Technology Review: "One of the big challenges in running this kind of competition is creating high-quality dataset in the first place, say Russakovsky and co. Every image in the database has to be annotated to a gold standard that the algorithms must meet. There is also training database of about 150,000 images that also have to be annotated. That is no easy task with such a large number of images. Russakovsky and co have done this using crowdsourcing on facilities such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk where they ask human users to categorize the images. That requires a significant amount of planning, crosschecking and rerunning when it does not work. But the result is a high quality database of images annotated to a high degree of accuracy, they say. An interesting question is how the top algorithms compare with humans when it comes to object recognition. Russakovsky and co have compared humans against machines and their conclusion seems inevitable. “Our results indicate that a trained human annotator is capable of outperforming the best model (GoogLeNet) by approximately 1.7%,” they say. In other words, it is not going to be long before machines significantly outperform humans in image recognition tasks." " Full article: http://www.technologyreview.com/vie...-that-quietly-changed-machine-vision-forever/
Title: Find social networks presence for the business listed Requester: OCMP [A1TI16GBKWZ4M8] (TO) TO Ratings: (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 3.78 Communicativity (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 4.48 Generosity (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 4.52 Fairness (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)(͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 4.69 Promptness Number of Reviews: 143 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Find online presence links for the business listed Time: 25 minutes Reward: $0.02 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 10000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98, Location is US Sup
I'll panic when the machines start doing the psych surveys, because at that point we are doomed as Turkers and free-willed organic lifeforms.
lol Good point. I'm trying to think (which is tough with my sleep deprived mind) but this would impact quite a few hits I like! Like the Social Photo batch, the Hotel Image categorization batch, Giphys.... heck even Set Masters are pretty fast and easy! But there will always be work -- not too worried
Earlier today I was doing them as filler while I was working on surveys, waiting for stuff to load, and so on. Still probably not worth it, though. Also, I'm still up. Yay me. Hello, night crew!
Lunar, I'm excited about witnessing that awkward transition from the Night Crew to Morning Crew... Actually not awkward. We just fall asleep at our keyboards and they take over seamlessly!
not really, .05-.10/min depending on the servers. But im doing them because they are easy and I can listen to this in the background [video=youtube;52NbxxVUGzk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNTwXlVieAs[/video] <------- Waiting, and Wondering when the next great batch will drop....
So on these OCMP when it is like this you just select N/A ? and when you come across this you visit both websites and choose the one that is correct? I have never done these before but I see some of you do like them...
Right, you just put N/A and move on... For multiple websites,, you can visit them . But the example you give there is for google plus. You will get that one the most and I always pick the "About" section because that gives all the basic information about the company.