You have one of my favorite sigs on here. The other one that comes to mind is someone who had one about how a person can only do so many surveys before losing their mind and going crazy. Anyone know who I'm talking about by chance?
Thanks! It still makes me chuckle sometimes too. I almost added one from last night where someone told Jessie they liked her balls, LOL! I've seen the sig you're talking about, but can't remember who had it. I don't see it very often.
Haha, I've been wondering if the blue balls on someone's face was intentional or not... I don't think I've seen it in awhile, I feel like it was someone who used to be active but might not post anymore. Too bad.
Title: Answer questions about yourself(~ 7 minutes) Requester: Ellen (and the Cornell Research Lab) [A1ASVBHHY3D9NB] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.86 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.81 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.85 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.83 Promptness Number of Reviews: 55 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: You will be asked questions about yourself and your views on the world. Time: 40 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.40 Qualifications: Exc: [1681637368-3973] has not been granted, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is one of: US 4:30
Title: How do you determine what's right and wrong? Requester: David Ciuk [ASH2EGNJZOQKB] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.86 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 14 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please answer some questions about moral beliefs Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.50 Qualifications: Masters has been granted, Total approved HITs is not less than 500, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US This took me 4 minutes
That sucks. TO looks like there was an unstated limit of 10. Hopefully nobody did a ton, not sure what they were.
Screener for potentially more lucre: Title: 2 min screening survey for well paid study by Harvard researchers Requester: Trisha Shrum [A1YSXRBD3UFOP0] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.00 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 5 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Answer a few demographic questions and a few opinion questions. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.10 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 0, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95 maybe 2 minutes.
I did 46 of them, but that was prior to him changing the description to limit the HITS to 10. So far he has rejected 2 of mine. The HITS wanted you to read hotel reviews and responses from the hotels and answer, in my opinion, somewhat subjective answers.
I did 20 yesterday. After I emailed, he said I wouldn't be penalized for doing more than 10 since he didn't have that in the HIT description, but followed that up by basically saying that they were going over them with a fine tooth comb. That tells me I should expect a few rejects, even though I agree. The questions were pretty subjective.
Title: Rate 10 advertisements Requester: Sofie Verstreken [AVJ1LBAD5RKXS] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.54 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.92 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.92 Promptness Number of Reviews: 26 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about 10 advertisement in this short survey Time: 3 days Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted
Whenever I see bad instructions leading to problems followed up with subjectiveness I feel like a requester needs to let a batch pass and then make actual instructions and guidelines. At least they aren't doing a blanket mass reject because they can or something.