Title: 10-min survey about a brand Requester: Anaïs Gretry [A2E2CM8R7JBWAC] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.75 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 14 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: In this hit, we ask you to read about a brand and then answer questions about it. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.20 Qualifications: Boost_Round1 has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US
Excuse me? Why can't we reveal details of the screener when the requester should not be forcing us to accept HITs before qualifying? This makes no sense to me.
Discussing any content of a survey here would defeat the entire purpose of having a survey to begin with. It's not against the rules here to say there's an unannounced/unpaid screener but it is against the rules to talk about anything specific.
Because it can tell people what they need to lie about in order to be eligible to finish taking it. edit: Or what they already said while I was typing
Don't bother. I tried. I laughed. I pleaded and begged not to reward that crappy requester. For some reason, the dollar is worth it. *shrug* Edit: It isn't just keeping it there for a week, either. There's a survey listed at 30 mins involved at the end.
Couple of minutes Title: Survey (20 cents) Requester: Cenk Kocas [A19J4PQYX6NGWT] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.75 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.38 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.47 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.41 Promptness Number of Reviews: 26 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Answer a short survey. Enter the given code into MTurk and earn 20 cents! Time: 15 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.20 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98, Location is US
Easy, possible bonus Title: What things make life easier and harder for people? SURVEY - $5 bonus Requester: Sarah Lane [A3T1OD4KT6JSKR] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.20 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.20 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: $5 bonus to random worker! -- Read short scenarios and answer how good or bad those scenarios are. Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.35 Qualifications: Masters has been granted
Title: Sketch and explain small solutions for a software program (Bonus can earn you up to $9.50) Requester: SDCL UCI [AY4D3FT9N3VGF] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: You will help to create an application to simulate traffic by sketching and explaining solutions for interfaces to create maps, cars, and rules Time: 2 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: None Anyone taking the chance?
Title: Explore our app and answer a brief survey about it Requester: MAD Labs [AH3L9684FUCS6] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 2.80 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.30 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.10 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.38 Promptness Number of Reviews: 32 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Test an app during few minutes and answer some questions Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Location is US
If I wanted to lie about my demo, I already know my demo is almost never part of the screener group anyway. I thought this forum was here to help Turkers and Requesters. You're not helping either by catering to requesters who not only waste our time, but also screw up our return rates.
Please do only take part (1) if you use a computer/laptop, (2) if you didn't already participate in a study on auction biddings within the last month, and (3) if it's daylight outside WTF?