It goes to the body shop on Monday. The front bumper is fucked but it doesn't SEEM like there is any frame damage. I'm hoping it's mostly cosmetic. It's a $500 deductible which I won't have until the end of the month and my insurance doesn't cover rental cost. I only get a discount :/
Thanks for the response. Sorry for the confusion, but are you saying this post didn't meet the rules? If so, is there a more appropriate place? Thanks!
1.5 Min Title: Answer a few short questions Requester: Joshua Knobe [A3INOEQSBNJES5] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.16 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.07 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.63 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.69 Promptness Number of Reviews: 102 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Answer a few short questions Time: 20 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
I have to know...was the giant paragraph of philosophical-scientific stuff that you edited out meant for another window, or did I just hallucinate that it ever existed?
we always rent from enterprise, but we pick the car and pay online cause its cheaper than going and doing it face to face. You can rent a car for a week with unlimited miles for under $200.
Damn hoped I edited it out quick enough so no one would notice. Youtube autoplay video tricked me. I got [video=youtube;eQVm8RokoBA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQVm8RokoBA[/video] playing after the Arby's video and I'm tired so I thought that was what was posted and responded to it.
No. They'll change if new ones are posted. You have your Mturk pages sorting by Hit Creation Date (Newest First) right? If it's set to anything else it won't show you the new ones as they pop up.
Greetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk, You've received a bonus from Project Endor for work related to 3PZDSVZ3J5MMM9P861J7XA8Q2MH4NI. The value of your bonus is: $0.01 USD The Requester included this note: Thank you for participating in our survey about your Google account settings. We have another similar survey available on MTurk now, which pays $1.00. You can view the new survey HIT here: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=3MGKBFT73MDAA4Y9Z9X7CPRZXPFSJA Thank you for working on our HITs! Unfortunately, all of the remaining HITs in this project have been reserved for other workers, and there are none left for you to do. Please check again tomorrow for more HITs to be available. (You must click the "Return HIT" button now to return this HIT.)
Oh it's fine. You asked what the rules were for the forum. Was stating the rules for your information. Sorry for confusing you.
OK I was able to retrieve my original post so here it is. Remember it is a response to this video [video=youtube;eQVm8RokoBA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQVm8RokoBA[/video] Argument has the same problem as Aquinas argument from the first cause. It seems to make sense and it can be seen to imply that there is a "cause" for everything to come about, modern physics actually disagrees with this when it comes to the big bang since a cause implies a line of causality but causality requires temporal relation and time was created by the big bang so there is no before the big bang for which things may happen but that is not the main problem, the main problem is we have not said anything about this creator. Just as the Ancient Greeks theology about the sun would be right if they simply associated Helios with the sun then we could never disprove the existence of Helios since it is manifestly clear the sun does exist and hence Helios exist. The problem with equating God with the "causer" of the big bang is it in no ways implies the existence of any type of intelligent creator. TL;DR version this is a linguistic argument for the existence of God by equating him with something that must exist even though the thing that must exist doesn't necessarily have the qualities you want God to have. I really wish I had finished up my degree in philosophy. Stupid foreign language requirement making me settle for only having 1 degree.
lol yeah. Well it was all I could thing of to quickly change topics. Didn't want everyone to thing I was some kind of insane person for posting that about a Simpson's clip about Arby's.