Not sure if we are supposed to be talking about AC or not but that's exactly the one I figured people missed.
i'm wondering how fair this really is. he set up his questions so that the answers basically went from extremely conservative responses to extremely liberal ones, so if i knew in advance where to look for the option i was most likely to choose, and it turned out to be correct, why would i read the others? i.e., if someone had a list of colors, and asked which one was my favorite, and my eyes immediately caught the one i wanted, why would i read the rest of the list?
David Brockman approved my payment. I remember that one, it had several standard attention checks and then one of them was "hidden" in the first political sentiments responses. Mine was in the gun control one, because there was a regular gun control question at the end of the sentiments. I felt it was a bit cheap, but I guarantee that's where you guys missed. EDIT: Looks like I'm a few minutes late, but there it is.
I remember the one that was in the middle of the page with abunch of other questions. The rest were on their own pages. No way we all missed that. Especially when it said at the beginning to pay attention. It seems like he sets it up to make you look like an idiot whether you do it right or not.
Yep very sneaky. Pretty sure I missed it, but had read about it afterwards on Reddit. Still haven't gotten my rejection tho.
Hey guess I can stop lurking now. I just did that survey also. I am hoping he doesnt reject me also I caught all of his AC's, there a few MC's in there also at the end. He is tricky. Or an ass
That is exactly what I did with that gun control question, I remember choosing the second option which was exactly how I felt and didnt even look at the other ones....extremely unfair.
when you're trying that hard to invalidate someone's response, and using a duplicate question which means the data for that 'check' is pointless to you as the requester, i say it stinks of simply not wanting to pay as many people as possible.
I remember seeing the gun control one and I'm 100 percent sure I passed it. Although I could have missed another one. This is just a little bit too fishy now....
and yeah, we shouldn't be discussing the exact nature of the question(s)... we should instead discuss where this requester can stick his survey...
I went through it SUPER SLOW, I seen 4 Attention Checks. Caught them all. If I get rejected he is for sure a ......bad man. May God be with us
I remember the question as well and thought very sneaky so I went from there being very careful with the survey. I can admit if I made an honest mistake, and while I've not been turking for all that long, I've learned enough so far to read the survey questions carefully - very carefully. So it makes me wonder was he setting it up for easy failure. I understand the need to make sure one isn't just clicking through, but then there are the those like me, and many here that are taking our time, that are reading the questions that are giving honest and thoughtful responses. Sometimes it makes me wonder - Oscar...(think stelllaaaa) nm, long day lol.
I remember the same question because I did a huge double-take after I almost missed it. Survey's already been approved though, I don't think he's mass rejecting on purpose, just has some stupid ACs.
Yep, the planes just crashed, idk what it has to do with the story. But, I do know that Skyler left, and now everything is fucked up!
but you're still accepting more of those hits?!? LOL I found the site where these descriptions might be going through the requester's linkedin profile just to get a better idea of what they're looking for (still dont know if it's a he or she lol) and it's a "parksleepfly" site so yea... "the not towards people in the town" comment is extremely shady, but since he/she left you a nice comment on one then maybe that's a good sign? idk. all of this is confusing.