I haven't found too many to flag either, so you may be doing ok. The only ones I've found to flag violate the following rules: No last names. Mentioning another company in the review. Claiming fraud by the company. I'm sure there will also be some spam/nonsense ones in there, but I haven't come across any yet.
Haha, that's good stuff. My waiting experience includes a total of 3 days at two restaurants, two years apart. I felt like strangling someone both times, and nothing all that bad happened. I guess that's just the life of the misanthrope.
I've had a record day today Almost all of it have been Crowdsource batches. Thanks Crowdsource! I should pass 5000 approved by the end of the weekend too. Yay!
"Got me in and out same day without appointment. I was quoted 2hrs it took about 2:30. Could use some reading meterial in waiting area and Water. Good thing I liked the music they played in the garage area because it was real loud, if it were rap or hip-hop I would not have been too thrilled. I was not in control of the TV clicker and I didnt like the the show they were watching, Maury Povich." waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
I've only been flagging the ones with other restaurant names if they're reviewing it like it's for that restaurant. Example: Thai House but they're reviewing it under a totally different name.
These are interesting - and easy - but do have a question. The instructions say to Fail a review that "includes comments about another review". Therefore, would you say that this type of comment should be placed in a FAIL status "I totally agree with the 2 recent reviews below"?
DISCLAIMER: I DON'T KNOW IF I'M DOING IT CORRECTLY If it has a personal experience in it, I've been passing them. I don't know what everyone else is doing. If it just says something about the other 2 reviews being wrong, I'd flag it. If it says "I ate blah blah soup here and it was the best damn soup this side of the Mississippi and I don't know what the other reviewers are talking about", I'll pass it.
It looks like the mentioning of another business rule is debatable If you find yourself in the mood for a great pizza, dont even consider this place. Of course if your standards are low (never had pizza before) and you dont mind being\nsurrounded by a somewhat unkempt and indifferent staff\n(I know tats are in but, really?) then this is the place for you. If you want a mouthwatering gourmet pizza, rush to Pizzicato. If you want a stellar authentic pie then run, dont walk to Kens Artisan. This one I flagged because it clearly mentions another business, would you all not?
Ha! If you want to spend $15 on a plate of (albeit exotically spiced) baby food which you eat with your hands from pancakes that have the texture of foam rubber whilst retaining the appearance of a CT scan of your brain, then this is the place for you. Also beware the cocktails which are more expensive than printed on the menu, because the menu is very old. A good place for hipsters to embarass exceptionally wealthy parents.
Example of mentioning other business that I didn't flag: Sure its funky, thats part of what makes it GREAT! But just funky isnt reason enough to stop in for lunch. Its the jynormus burgers and the cold beer that sets this place above the rest. Get the double with cheese and don?t forget the goop. The fries are hand-cut and way better than average. Outdoor seating is the best on a nice day. If you want prissy-clean, go to Applebee?s or iHop; you wouldnt have fun here anyway.
By the time this batch is done, I'll be able to get a concierge job in Portland, without ever having been there.
Greatest HITs collection 2: grammar and other lulz - matre di, assit, art noveau, celibrating - "Came in for lunchtime on Tuesday, since I had a need for falafel and wifi." - "Ive taken my 2 cats to this clinic since they were born (the cats, not the Vets)" - "Why own a childrens shop when you HATE kids?" - "This place is kind of the bar equivalent of junior high."