A bit surprised I've never gotten rejected for that then. I have had to do that many times :surprised:
5 min Title: Please answer a survey about relations between groups and states | AcceptA Requester: David Rousseau [AZTE38WKV3VY7] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.00 Duration: 1 hour Available: 1 Description: Give us your opinion about how groups relate to each other. Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US
Title: 5 Minute survey about a laptop PC advertisement | AcceptA Requester: Phillip M Hart [A1BAMVCN9WSB98] Contact TV: [Hrly: $27.27] [Pay: null] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 4.82] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 17] [ToS: 0] TO2: [Hrly: ---] [Pen: ---] [Res: ---] [Rec: ---] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $0.50 Duration: 10 minutes Available: 1 Description: Give us your opinion about advertisement Requirements: Masters Exists Under 5 min
Might have just been lucky up until now. Sometimes attention checks are so anal and nitpicking I want to reach into the screen and flick these people upside the head, but I don't think I'd ever have the nerve to try that myself. There are a couple of requesters I would happily beat within an inch of their lives, risking jail, but risk a rejection? I have my limits, damn it all.
The swans by this giant lake I walk around are making these huge nests and the city put yellow tape around them so no one bothers them it's pretty cute lol :swan:
All too often the problem is they don't want to reveal what piece of information in an information landslide is the one they are really studying. And yet when it comes to AC time they want to be absolutely sure you managed to pick out and remember that tiny detail that actually matters to them. Idiots. The idea that some people find what they are studying so utterly inconsequential they barely notice the information on it is apparently inconceivable.
Title: Test your abilities with this quick study(~ 15 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Anni Sternisko [A3IDCIBVVTM25T] (Contact) (Req TV): N/A (TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] Description: This study evaluates a new mental exercise to improve performance in ability tests. Time: 2 hour(s) HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Exc: [77712-77123] DoesNotExist; Location In US; a few words then a few more then a list then returned
7 questions, under a minute Title: Answer a short survey about your opinions | AcceptA Requester: Heather Krause [AGLDA5Z87GPAV] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $0.40 Duration: 5 minutes Available: 1 Description: Very short five question opinion survey Requirements: None
Just did 180 penny hits for someone with no TO. Andy Kish, categorization hits. Super simple, is there a watermark or not. I couldn't see one anywhere on any of them, so I'm racing through, saying prayers of thanks for easy pennies...and then I see it. A teensy weensy, itsy bitsy, ultra-faint x in the lower right hand corner of one of the pictures. A watermark, but so small and so faint as to be all but invisible. Now I have to wonder how many I missed among the buttload I did--180 at least---all of them waiting approval, sitting there on my dashboard like a pile of tiny time bombs. Drinky-poo time, I think.:wine:
They're back up. Crawling through this time Title: Categorization | AcceptA Requester: Andy Kish [A1DT20RUUBRGP8] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $0.01 Duration: 1 hour Available: 13248 Description: Choose the correct category Requirements: Masters Exists
They really should have provided an example or two. Once you know what you are looking for, an awful lot of these are watermarked.
Seeker. Yes it is. I woke up cold this morning. That was weird after having 80 degree weather last week. At least that's temporary. Nice hat by the way. I like the color.