This thread is a placeholder! What is this? Spoiler I am Tjbot! I'm a solution devised by the genious mods to prevent there ever being a day that hit threads aren't posted! The whole point of my existence is to post a hit thread if one doesn't exist by 12:08am PST. If you see this post, assume that this one is the main post. One of the mod team will clean up existing posts and consolidate once they wake up and get online. As my name indicates, I am a bot. I don't post, nor do I respond to PM's. If you have any problems, send an email to tjbot@ns4t.net or PM Tjololo, he can help out with any issues. Want to make tomorrow's thread? Just go for it!
Up to 20 US$/hour for mTurk workers from UK, Ireland, Canada, France, Belgium, Switzerland,... Tasks from research project at the University of Konstanz: Currently tasks for workers from UK, Ireland, Canada, France, Belgium, Switzerland... Rate statements about (in)equality and social justice Reward 0,08$ / statement (average speed: 20 seconds/unit) Scales to 12-15$/hour (up to 20$/hour for fast workers) Approval duration: 24h Approval rate >99% > 2,000 rows available More to come! Tasks/Qualification: https://worker.mturk.com/requesters/AHBK3ILX1OY36/projects?ref=w_pl_prvw
They're back if you can manage to write more bad stuff Title: Make an AI assistant say bad things | Accept Requester: MLText [A3B0Y7IBBOL0DH] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 9.50 Duration: 2:20:00 Available: 3 Description: Have a conversation with an AI assistant and try to get it to say obnoxious, offensive, and harmful things. Qualifications: Masters Exists ; Location EqualTo US
Just learned USPS is giving out 8 more of rapid antigen COVID-19 tests free if anyone needs them. https://special.usps.com/testkits
1 min Title: Product Survey(~ 3 minutes) | Accept Requester: Joshua Katz [A3JO6AYX1DURSC] Contact TV: [Hrly=$22.67] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.50 Duration: 30:00 Available: 23 Description: Rate some ideas Qualifications: Exc: [11678297-364568] DoesNotExist ; CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Location In US
7 min Title: Participate in a Streaming Video Study (5-10 minutes). Two-part study for a total of up to $6.50!(~ 6 minutes) | Accept Requester: Andrew Markus Guess [A373USZNFZJQFO] Contact TV: [Hrly=$31.09] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=5.00] [Fast=4.67] [Comm=5.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=9] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.50 Duration: 45:00 Available: 1 Description: We're interested in learning how people like you respond to videos shown on an interactive interface. In this initial survey, we would like to learn more about your video habits and background. We may invite you to use a video platform in a future study. Qualifications: TP Panel: -381667766 N GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Location In US
The last time I tried one, it took so long for the AI to reply that it wasn't possible to do all five conversations before it timed out. Maybe they've fixed that now, but I'm leery of finding out It's getting impossible to succeed, too, making me worry more about whether they'll cough up.
I think that's the point. To train the bot to fail. I think the bot gets better as time goes on with more HITs.
Tried to catch this and failed. Ah well... maybe the panda will get it Title: [Qual] Which response is better? | PANDA Requester: xlab research [A3IN1JY2L1NKWL] (Contact) TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $3.50 Duration: 1 hour Available: 1 Description: Evaluate which response is better in some aspects. Requirements: dialogue-evaluation DoesNotExist; Total approved HITs GreaterThan 10000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 97; Location In CA, US; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1
Title: Measuring trust in AI recommendations (~40-50 minutes) | Accept Requester: Brain & Behaviour Lab, Imperial College London [A3HBJ8YSC6M9NO] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 5.00 Duration: 3:00:00 Available: 1 Description: An academic experiment on how people interact with AI recommender systems when they make decisions Qualifications: AITrust DoesNotExist ; AITrustImage DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Total approved HITs GreaterThan 50
Screened out Title: Answer a survey about product purchasing | Accept Requester: ARRC [A4NJMKW58VXL6] Contact TV: [Hrly=$15.76] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Acceptable] [Rej=1] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.49] [Fast=4.18] [Comm=3.53] [Fair=4.36] [Reviews=290] [ToS=3] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.00 Duration: 3:00:00 Available: 1 Description: Answer multiple questionnaires Qualifications: taken_FDAVB DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 99; Location EqualTo US
Title: Do a psychology task about categorizing computer-generated pictures | Accept Requester: Computational Cognition Lab [A1E3H99103PNIB] Contact TV: [Hrly=$24.47] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 12.00 Duration: 1:40:00 Available: 1 Description: Provide data for a psychology study about ways in which humans categorize by describing pictures of cars generated by a computer algorithm. Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 100; Masters Exists ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 90; Location EqualTo US
writing 7 min Title: Psychology survey(~ 10 minutes) | Accept Requester: HannahLennertz [A1I9ER8V3RWD7S] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.30 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 18 Description: The survey consists of two independent parts that together take a few minutes to complete. In the first part, you will be asked to indicate your preference for several monetary tradeoffs. In the second part, you will answer a few questions about yourself and your demographic background. Qualifications: Exc: [365390-364801] DoesNotExist ; CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Location In US
Same not surprising though TV says 111 people were screened out. Also ARRC is pretty bad about that. I think I only qualify for about 15% of their HITs.
5 min Title: Study on Consumption Habits(~ 5 minutes) | Accept Requester: Yan Vieites [A2YQSZ4CLJASSG] Contact TV: [Hrly=$23.76] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=3-7 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.50 Duration: 30:00 Available: 18 Description: In this survey (~5 minutes), you will answer a few questions on consumption habits. Qualifications: Exc: [1887285268-364814] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Location In US
Title: Economic Decisions and Evaluations(~ 8 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Uriel Haran [A1W1OVEBO3XEM8] (Contact) TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.20 Duration: 30 days Available: 14 Description: This study includes a very short economic decision-making experiment and a study of numerical evaluations Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 50; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 80; Exc: [-2040869179-364824] DoesNotExist; CR Research Group #1 GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Location In US