YES! Only one I like. Considered doing it, then thought "WTF WHY ARE YOU CONSIDERING THIS THAT'S YOUR VAGINA."
Title: Annotate Objects In Images Requester: vocds [AR3B90GZOP6DS] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.50 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 2.68 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.61 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.77 Promptness Number of Reviews: 31 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Help us discover objects that are in images! Time: 30 minutes Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98, Location is US Why doesn't anyone do these HITS? Just curious.
Something *like these though? No convertible here. That's what I'll do, something polarized, prescription, probably <$100 after insurance. I'm too old for clip-on goggles.
Yeah, I'm just seeing a lot of ugly prescription sunglasses. It's gonna be a tough call. Interesting.
I haven't encountered any that required too much annotating. so I wasn't sure if the TO was wrong or not.. I've done the sentence hits for them and haven't had a rejection yet. Just wanted to check out other's viewpoints.. Thanks. Bout to hang it up for the night. Hope everyone has a good night.
So.. There is this vacant/abandoned house right next door to me (glad they left) and yesterday I noticed about 8 little kittens sneaking about. Feral? what should i do?