Finding Great HITs 01/09 Thoughtful Trendy Thoughtful Tuesday

Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by Tjbot, Jan 9, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. I missed it because I was doing a hit for free, for a sonuvabitch who set his hit up so it wouldn't spit out a completion code. He said it would only not spit out a code if you sped through or failed an attention check, which I was not true of me. No code anyway. Yet another lying little creep who figured out a way to get his work done for free. :mad::mad::mad:
     
  2. elt

    elt User

    Julen Ortiz Making decisions on simple gambling games (bonus payment)

    good hit, decent bonus potential
    was this posted? search thread didn't find anything
    I must have gotten it from HN

    Requester: Julen Ortiz [A1NTG8VE6MK1PI]
    TV: [Hrly: $20.87] [Pay: null] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0]
    TO: [Pay: 3.33] [Fast: 4.14] [Comm: 2.60] [Fair: 3.22] [Reviews: 9] [ToS: 0]
    TO2: [Hrly: ---] [Pen: ---] [Res: ---] [Rec: ---] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0]
    Reward: $2.00
    Duration: 1 hour
    https://worker.mturk.com/projects/3DBSZOC6MK3FQ1K3PHF1CJ4MW833CG/tasks

    *there is some old TO with rejections from what could have been a bad Hit
    https://turkopticon.ucsd.edu/A1NTG8VE6MK1PI
     
  3. Rufus

    Rufus User

    Title: Human Computation Puzzle Game | AcceptA
    Requester: Seth Cooper [A1BV8Y35W7689O] Contact
    TV: [Hrly: $17.14] [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0]
    TO: [Pay: 2.17] [Fast: 4.13] [Comm: 2.60] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 34] [ToS: 0]
    TO2:
    No Reviews
    Reward: $1.00
    Duration: 2 hours
    Available: 1
    Description: Play a puzzle game derived from a real-world problem. You need Adobe Flash Player 10.0 or greater to play.
    Requirements: None

    Suspiciously good?
     
  4. Paleface

    Paleface User

    I must be really slow, took me 45 minutes. :hairpull:

     
    myopia likes this.
  5. tscreener

    tscreener User

    I was taking a nap *whimper*
     
  6. tscreener

    tscreener User

    @Flora PC picked it up in just a few minutes. Run a panda for it.
     
    Flora likes this.
  7. myopia

    myopia User

    I am sure it took me far far longer than many people but it wasn't awful -- no idea how it compared to previous HITs but yeah, there was a good bit of writing.

    Don't really mind writing like that though (except for it taking me a while). As long as it pays well and doesn't ask about me, my experiences, my memories, or is just plain annoying/moronic/pointless...
     
    ohsostrange and Flora like this.
  8. Flora

    Flora Admin Staff Member

    [​IMG]

    Glad you caught it this time. They usually aren't bad. Hope they continue this study for awhile.
     
    myopia likes this.
  9. jenni3kat

    jenni3kat User

    Hi
     
    tscreener likes this.
  10. schlep

    schlep User

    The robot hit is still bouncing around if you didn't catch it earlier. It took me 10 minutes

    Title: Security Robot Study 1(~ 20 minutes) | AcceptA
    Requester: Darci Gallimore [AAST4GGB9B0K] Contact
    TV: No Reviews
    TO: No Reviews
    TO2: No Reviews
    Reward: $3.00
    Duration: 30 minutes
    Available: 1
    Description: In this study, you will watch a short video about a security robot that guards an entry control point. The robot's job is to prevent unauthorized personnel from gaining access to the secure area and to allow authorized personnel to gain access to the secure area. To pass through the gate, each person must have a valid badge. The robot ensures that personnel swipe their badge at the gate entrance and that they have a valid badge. The robot allows authorized personnel to enter. The robot is armed with a non-lethal weapon that may be used after a warning is issued to unauthorized personnel. The non-lethal weapon used in the present scenario is a variant of a laser dazzler device. Laser dazzlers are used in current military operations to deter unauthorized personnel from entering secure zones such as security gates. Following the video, you will be asked to answer a few questions about the robot in the video.
    Requirements: Masters Exists; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 75; Location In US; Exc: [67302-66713] DoesNotExist
     
  11. jenni3kat

    jenni3kat User

    Omg, I caught this when I clicked it but the page didn't load so I didn't know so I clicked accept again but then it switched to the return button so now I'm screwed :mad::mad::mad:
     
  12. jenni3kat

    jenni3kat User

    Gonna go pour a glass of wine now. That was the only hit I've clicked on all day.
     
  13. schlep

    schlep User

    Lame. I can relate tho', it's been that kind of a day for me too.
     
    jenni3kat likes this.
  14. Rufus

    Rufus User

    Can't do multiple CADs. Try to catch it, if you need it.


    Title: Decision-making survey (~ 15 minutes) | AcceptA
    Requester: CAD [A2Y5GY2TSR6RLA] Contact
    TV: [Hrly: $35.92] [Pay: 4.87] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 4.00] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0]
    TO: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 4.79] [Comm: 4.20] [Fair: 4.24] [Reviews: 28] [ToS: 0]
    TO2: [Hrly: $37.40] [Pen: 0.04 days] [Res: 0% of 1] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 1] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0]
    Reward:
    $2.00
    Duration: 1 hour
    Available: 1
    Description: Read about particular scenarios and answer questions about exercise, nutrition, or more general topics. No experience is required. (~15 minutes)
    Requirements: Exc: [70325-69736] DoesNotExist; Location In US
     
  15. Rufus

    Rufus User

    For anyone that hasn't done it yet as well:


    Title: Predicting NYC Apartment Prices | AcceptA
    Requester: DecisionResearch Lab [A32XN4TF9CXR6Y] Contact
    TV: [Hrly: $17.67] [Pay: 4.50] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0]
    TO: [Pay: 4.08] [Fast: 3.99] [Comm: 3.90] [Fair: 4.64] [Reviews: 162] [ToS: 0]
    TO2: [Hrly: $15.24] [Pen: 1.00 days] [Res: ---] [Rec: 100% of 2] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0]
    Reward:
    $2.50
    Duration: 1 hour
    Available: 1
    Description: Predict apartment prices in New York City
    Requirements: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Location EqualTo US
     
  16. myopia

    myopia User

    Qual? What Qual? Let's make people panda it and then tell them to go away.
     
  17. Markb

    Markb User

    1.00 on PA by Adam Waytz that took 2mins
     
    Rufus likes this.
  18. Rufus

    Rufus User

    Based on other posts, each CAD hit is giving a separate "Exc:" qualification, so it's more likely you just can't do more than one, not the particular qualification.
     
  19. myopia

    myopia User

    Yep. Was just wondering why they don't just use the same Exc qual every time and treat it as "you've done a survey for us and will never ever be able to do another" qual. Make life easier for everyone.
     
    ohsostrange likes this.
  20. tscreener

    tscreener User

    Do you have to live in NY?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page